A difficult question asked by the interviewer can be frustrating to handle. Although this does not happen all of the time, it is always better to prepare yourself for the possibility. Prior to the day, write down what you consider your weaknesses to be, as well as any issues that a potential employer may discover about you and your past work history. Instead of lying about accomplishments or traits, be honest, but also show that you’re willing to keep learning and moving forward.
These are transitional-age youth, said Carole McKindley-Alvarez, who oversees case management for the court. Theyre supposed to make some kind of screwed-up choices. We all did. Thats how you learn. Surprisingly, this alternative legal philosophy springs not from concerns about overcrowded prisons or overburdened courts, but from neuroscience. Researchers have long known that the adolescent brain is continually rewiring itself, making new connections and pruning unnecessary neurons as it matures. useful sourceOnly recently has it become clear that the process stretches well into early adulthood. Buried in that research is an uncomfortable legal question: If their brains have not fully matured, how responsible are adults ages 18 to 24 for their crimes? Should they be treated more like adolescents, handled in the comparatively lenient juvenile system, or more like hardened 35-year-olds? Should young adults be held fully responsible for certain crimes but not others? After attending a lecture at Harvard on brain development, George Gascon, the San Francisco district attorney, decided to tackle these questions head on. In 2015, he and Wendy Still, then the citys probation chief, established Young Adult Court, a hybrid of the adult and juvenile justice systems tailored to the biology and circumstances of offenders 18 to 24.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/17/health/young-adult-court-san-francisco-california-neuroscience.html